Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Newsroom
  3. FORMER OWNERS OF STUDIO 69 SETTLE PREGNANCY BIAS SUIT
Press Release 07-23-2009

FORMER OWNERS OF STUDIO 69 SETTLE PREGNANCY BIAS SUIT

EEOC Said Nightclub Fired Bartender Because She Was Expecting

EL PASO,  Texas – 54 Downtown, Inc., a  Texas corporation which owned and operated Studio 69, a downtown El Paso  nightclub, has agreed to pay $15,000 and furnish other relief to settle a  pregnancy discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity  Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit  (Civil Action No. EP-08-CV-0374-PRM), filed in the El Paso Division of the U.S.  District Court for the Western District of Texas, 54 Downtown, Inc., through  the actions of its owners, Bahram Razy and Houshang Shirazi, violated Title VII  of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it fired Crystal Aguilar from her job as a  bartender at Studio 69 because of her pregnancy.

During this lawsuit, 54 Downtown,  Inc. admitted that Aguilar was placed on what the company referred to as  “leave” because of her pregnancy and that she was not told the date on which this  “leave” was to end. It was undisputed  that prior to placing Aguilar on “pregnancy / maternity leave,” the employer  had neither requested nor received any information from her doctor regarding  her physical ability to perform her job duties.

“In a 1991 case called International Union et al. v. Johnson  Controls, the United States Supreme Court explicitly held that the decision  to work while being pregnant was reserved for each individual, not her  employer, to make,” said EEOC Trial Attorney Tisha Dominguez. “This employer took unlawful action based on pregnancy-related  assumptions about Crystal Aguilar’s physical ability to continue to perform her  job duties that were not even based on any kind of medical information.”

“Ms. Aguilar was terminated at a  time when she most needed her job, simply because of outdated and sexist  stereotypes about pregnant women,” said Aguilar’s attorney, Francisco X.  Dominguez, of the law firm of Dominguez & Coyle, P.L.L.C. “She appreciates the EEOC’s efforts to  protect working women like her.”

In addition to agreeing to pay Aguilar  $15,000, 54 Downtown, Inc. is enjoined from engaging in any employment practice  which discriminates on the bases of sex and/or pregnancy. 54 Downtown, Inc., which has sold Studio 69,  has also agreed that it will post a notice regarding its intention not to  discriminate against any employees, and that it will provide training to all of  its employees on the subject of the employment provisions of Title VII,  including sex and pregnancy discrimination, if it resumes business within the  next five years.

“In pregnancy cases such as this, the  monetary damages are often relatively modest, but the injunction against future  conduct is extremely important to protecting the rights of other women who may  simply wish to be working moms,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Robert Canino of  the Dallas District Office. “It is a  shame that in this day and age, we still have to get that message out through  court action, but the public nature of law enforcement can serve as one effective  form of preventative education.”

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment  discrimination. Further information about the Commission is  available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.